Skip to content
For Clinics

Better prep. Fewer no-shows. Less phone work.

Aescia for Clinics is a workflow platform for specialty clinics, with endoscopy as the first home. Pre-procedure pathways delivered by SMS and email into a patient web-app. Diabetic, anticoagulant, and GLP-1 overlays. Recall tracking that stops slipping. It does not propose clinical decisions. It is not a medical device.

Posture

Not a medical device. Not a decision tool.

A workflow and patient-preparation platform. Does not diagnose, does not treat, does not propose clinical decisions.

Nine things that run the day-to-day.

01

Prep pathways that adapt

Pick the prep your clinic uses. The pathway adapts to the patient in front of it. Diabetic, IBD, constipation, prior-failed-prep, elderly, all covered without rewriting the page.

02

No-show reduction

Timed reminders in the patient language, a confirm-and-reschedule path built in, a same-day flag your front desk can actually act on. Waitlist auto-fill on cancellation.

03

GLP-1 handling

Patient self-reports the medication and the dose. The pathway delivers the clinician-authored instruction that corresponds to the patient's report, aligned with the 2024 multi-society guidance and the 2025 international consensus. Decisions remain with the proceduralist.

04

Diabetic and anticoagulant overlays

SGLT2, metformin, DOAC, and warfarin scenarios delivered as clinician-authored instructions, generated from the patient's answers. The clinician signs off the rule set, not the vendor.

05

Prep-night photo review

The evening before, the patient can upload a toilet-bowl photo through the web-app. The pathway auto-rates it against a clinician-set rubric and either confirms the slot or triggers rescheduling before the patient leaves home.

06

Call deflection

Two-way messaging by SMS and email answers the top twenty prep questions before they reach the front desk, using templated clinician-authored responses. The clinic sees the exceptions, not every message.

07

Surveillance and recall

High-risk polyp follow-up and surveillance intervals do not rely on a spreadsheet anyone might miss. Named patients, named dates, named triggers, aligned with USMSTF and NHMRC interval guidance.

08

Integration-friendly

Designed to sit alongside the systems your clinic already runs and to be quick to set up, without a second login for your team. We scope any data exchange with you.

09

Single-site friendly

Configured by one clinic admin in an afternoon. Per-scope pricing in the US, no per-seat math. Designed to go live in weeks once a champion is in place, not quarters.

Built for the ambulatory rhythm.

This is not a hospital discharge tool dressed for a clinic. It is a prep and workflow product with its own authored protocols, its own SMS layer, and its own vocabulary: today's list, room utilisation, case turnover, prep adequacy, recall compliance.

Today's listthe live schedule view
Room utilisationthroughput per room
Prep adequacyBoston Bowel Prep aligned
Recall compliancesurveillance interval tracking
Case turnovertime between completed procedures
Staff flagsexceptions your team still owns

Prep brands by region.

The pathway covers regional brand equivalents across the markets we support. Clinicians in each country see the prep names their patients see on the shelf.

US
United States
SuPrep, SuTab, CLENPIQ, GoLytely, NuLYTELY
CA
Canada
PegLyte, PICO-SALAX, CLENPIQ, Bi-PEG-Lyte
AU/NZ
Australia and New Zealand
Glycoprep, Picoprep, MoviPrep, Plenvu
UK/EU
United Kingdom and EU
Plenvu, Moviprep, Citrafleet

Specialties in scope.

Endoscopy is the first clinical focus: colonoscopy and gastroscopy pathway development is active, with regional bowel-prep variants and specialty overlays in build. The same engine extends to physiotherapy post-discharge, aesthetics, and other efficiency-seeking specialties as clinical champions join. If your specialty is not listed, we will build the pathway with you.

Colonoscopy
With regional prep variants and clinician-authored overlays
First focus
Gastroscopy
Pre-procedure fasting, meds review, GLP-1 overlay
First focus
Physiotherapy post-discharge
Elective orthopaedic, spinal, and joint pathways
On roadmap
Aesthetics and cosmetic
Consent, prep, photo capture, follow-up
On roadmap
Your specialty
If a clinical champion is in place, we build the pathway with you
Open
A fit for your practice?

What makes a specialty a good candidate.

We do not prescribe which specialties belong on the platform. We ask whether the friction is real, whether there is a clinician willing to co-author the pathway, and whether the patient journey has the kind of between-visit gap the engine can bridge.

  • 01
    A wait list under pressure
    Long wait times, over-booked lists, or patients waiting weeks for a procedure where prep quality or no-shows are the rate-limiting step.
  • 02
    No-shows and cancellations eating throughput
    Empty chairs, same-day cancellations, or inadequate preparation forcing repeat appointments. Any of these costs your team hours and the patient a delay.
  • 03
    Patient education and adherence between visits
    Specialties where the weeks before or after an appointment carry risk: chronic disease, procedural prep, post-treatment monitoring, rehabilitation, lifestyle-dependent outcomes.
  • 04
    Direct clinician oversight, or hands-off
    Some clinicians want every flag to route through them. Others want the pathway to handle the routine and surface only exceptions. The engine supports either, and the choice is set per pathway.
  • 05
    A clinician willing to author
    Someone whose name goes on the rule set. The pathway is only as good as the clinician who authored it, and we do not ship one without a named author.
Evidence stage

What the category has shown. What Aescia has not yet shown.

The category has supporting literature.

Patient-prep coaching, SMS reminders, and structured pre-procedure communication have a published evidence base. The four figures below the ROI calculator are the load-bearing ones for ambulatory endoscopy: Mehta 2021 on a prep-focused intervention, Allen 2023 on the facility-fee cost per cancelled slot, Beran 2024 on the risk factors that make inadequate prep common and addressable (n=358,257, 154 studies), and Lebwohl 2011 on the downstream adenoma miss rate. The calculator acts on late cancellations and no-shows, and credits backfill only on the late cancellations that arrive with about a day's notice, which is enough to fill the slot.

Aescia for Clinics is pre-first-customer.

Aescia for Clinics has not yet published its own outcomes. The Hospitals product is in active clinical evaluation through SAFE-Discharge at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, but that trial is cardiothoracic surgical recovery, not endoscopy preparation. The honest position: the calculator below scales the category literature to your site; Aescia-specific outcomes come from the design-partner pilots, measured against your own baseline.

How Aescia builds its pathways.

Pathways start from published evidence-based guidelines for each specialty (USMSTF and NHMRC for surveillance, multi-society guidance for GLP-1 peri-procedural handling, regional bowel-preparation protocols, society anticoagulation guidance). A practising clinician authors the rule set against those guidelines. The rules are then stress-tested against simulated synthetic-patient cohorts before they touch a real patient, so edge cases (diabetic and anticoagulated overlays, prior inadequate preparation, GLP-1 exposure with insulin) surface and are resolved in the rule editor rather than in the front-desk call queue. Every pathway carries a named clinical author and a documented guideline trail.

The economics

Run your own numbers.

A busy endoscopy list loses more to cancelled prep, GLP-1 confusion, and follow-up drift in a week than Aescia costs for the month. The numbers below are yours, not ours. Set the four inputs to your ASC and the model rescales. Three honest bands, conservative through potential, anchored to the literature beneath.

Your numbers

Set the inputs to your own ASC. Defaults are an average US GI ASC and the US literature midpoints, sourced below. Every figure to the right rescales in real time.

Range of outcomes

Three bands tied to effect sizes from the literature. Aescia commits to no point estimate. Pilots are scoped to confirm where on the range your site lands.

Conservative
$261K/yr
6.5×
ROI
Expected
$369K/yr
9.2×
ROI
Potential
$478K/yr
12.0×
ROI
Every month without Aescia
you are losing about $22K
and your endoscopists are losing about $7.1K in professional fees
Across the full episode, each missed slot also forgoes about $4.3K in anesthesia and $1.1K in pathology. Those accrue to the anesthesia group and the lab, so they sit outside the ROI above.
Conservative band, contingent on a pilot validating the effect at your site. Assumptions and sources are below.
Upstream: the prep itself
Inadequate prep is the upstream driver, and it is folded into the figures above. Of the recovered slots, coaching prep down accounts for roughly 56 to 113 avoided repeat or aborted procedures a year, about $57K to $114K.
Downstream: surveillance recall
Patients lost to follow-up never come back. Recapturing them could add about 150 surveillance return scopes a year, about $152K, if your schedule has the capacity. This works down a standing backlog rather than repeating every year.

Assumptions, made visible

  • Late cancellation reduction: 20% / 35% / 50% (conservative / expected / potential).
  • No-show reduction: 15% / 25% / 40%.
  • Prep-aware backfill rate on late cancellations: 55% / 65% / 75%, against a current rate you set (default 25%). The model credits only the lift over your current rate, on late cancellations only. Pilot-to-prove against your own baseline.
  • Prevention is netted by your current backfill: a late cancellation you would have refilled anyway is not counted as a recovered slot, so prevention and backfill do not double-count.
  • A recovered slot is valued at the recovered revenue (gross facility fee) you set, not contribution margin. The endoscopist professional fee, anesthesia and pathology are shown as separate full-episode lines and stay out of the facility figure and the ROI multiple, since anesthesia accrues to the anesthesia group and pathology to the lab.
  • Endoscopist professional fee: the per-scope figure you set drives the separate endoscopist loss line, on the same recoverable slots. Default $400 is a reasonable commercial professional fee for a colonoscopy — Medicare pays ~$220–300 (CPT 45378/45385 at the 2026 conversion factor) and commercial ~$300–500. Against the commercial facility fee that is about a 2.5:1 facility-to-professional split, the normal commercial range. Set both to your own rates.
  • Staff time is included in the figures above: 60% of your nurse prep-call minutes (default 20 min/patient) at $45/hr loaded. Treat it as the soft part of the range: it is real cash only if you redeploy the freed hours into more cases or a deferred hire.
  • Aescia price: $8/scope, US institutional rate, which is the spend the ROI multiple is measured against. Volume tiers and design-partner discounts not reflected here.
  • Aescia commits to the conservative band in writing during design-partner pilots; the backfill lift is confirmed against your own baseline in the pilot.
  • Backfill applies to late cancellations only (about a day's notice). Same-day prep failures and no-shows are not backfillable, so they count toward prevention, never backfill. No-show default 8% (typical 5–15%).
  • Beran 2024 (Am J Gastroenterol, n=358,257, 154 studies) anchors that inadequate prep is a common, upstream problem with addressable risk factors. Cancellation/no-show effect sizes are from the prep-coaching and SMS-reminder literature.
  • Facility fee: Allen 2023, CMS ASC CPT 45378–45385 (USD $989–$1,034).
  • Anesthesia: about $240/scope, the expected MAC-weighted figure (commercial roughly $410 per monitored-anesthesia case at about 58% utilization; Predmore 2019, USC Schaeffer 2021). Accrues to the anesthesia group, shown for the full-episode picture, not in the ROI multiple.
  • Pathology: about $60/scope expected, biopsy-weighted (CPT 88305 commercial about $82 per specimen, roughly 1.7 specimens on about 45% of scopes; PayerPrice 2026, GIQuIC). The softest figure here, and it accrues to the lab, not the ROI multiple.
  • Inadequate prep: default 15% of scopes (US real-world 10–25%; 2025 USMSTF benchmark 10% or less). Coaching, navigation and reminders cut it by 25% / 40% / 50% (Guo 2016, Tian 2021, Faveri 2025). About 30% of inadequate preps consume a repeat or aborted slot (GIQuIC 32% recommended within a year, VA 59% completed). This repeat recovery is folded into the recovered slots and the ROI above.
  • Surveillance recapture: roughly half of post-polypectomy patients are overdue or never return (US Medicare 5-year non-return about 48%; Schoen 2014, cross-checked against high-risk-adenoma and large-polyp cohorts). Reminders roughly double completion (Sci Reports 2021). Capacity-conditional and outside the ROI multiple.

The literature the calculator is anchored to.

Four published figures the model relies on. They are listed here in plain text so a procurement reviewer, a clinical advisor, or a retrieval-augmented assistant can verify each one without operating the calculator.

Published ROI from a prep-focused intervention
USD $82K saved over 16 weeks

Mehta 2021

Facility-fee revenue lost per cancelled or repeated US ASC colonoscopy
USD $989–$1,034 per slot

Allen 2023, CMS ASC fees CPT 45378–45385

Inadequate prep is common and largely predictable
48 predictable risk factors

Beran 2024, n=358,257 (154 studies)

Adenoma miss rate on inadequate preparation
Up to 42%

Lebwohl 2011

Public and modelled figures. Site-specific ROI requires a scoped evaluation against your own list volume, no-show rate, and prep-inadequacy baseline.

Pricing

Priced per scope. Range published, not gated.

Aescia for Clinics is priced per scope at the single-site level. No per-seat pricing. The range below covers the typical US ambulatory surgery centre by physician count. A site-specific quote is generated against your scope volume in the ROI calculator above.

United States

Per-scope at the institutional rate, USD.

  • Institutional default — US$8 per scope. Practice or facility entity contracts; flat post-conversion. During the design-partner pilot, the structure is 15% gainshare against measured value (or free-until-proof; see the design-partner page).
  • Aggregator volume tier — US$6 per scope. Multi-state aggregators with more than 50,000 scopes per year on a single contract.
  • Non-equity individual physician — US$3,800 per year. Rare edge case (physician with no facility-side capture). Requires signed attestation rider.

Single-site single-specialty US ASC typically falls in US$8,000 to US$77,000 per year, by physician count: solo own-facility ~$8K, 4-MD ASC ~$38K, 8-MD ASC ~$64K.

This is the typical span, not a quote. Your exact figure is generated above against your scope volume in the ROI calculator (at US$8 per scope).

What scales the price
  • Adds the price. Additional specialties beyond the first. Additional protocols inside a specialty where each requires a new clinician-authored rule set. US: scope volume.
  • Does not add the price. Patient volume within the base tier. Number of front-desk users. SMS volume within reasonable use. Customer support contact time during design-partner phase.
  • Value-floor rule. Aescia's contracted rate is held below the customer's modelled annual benefit. If the calculator does not show net positive at signature, the contract does not get signed.

For US design partners the rate is locked for three years with a CPI or 5% capped escalator and no conversion to gain-share during the locked term. See the design-partner program for the full commercial shape.

Design-partner terms