Prep pathways that adapt
Pick the prep your clinic uses. The pathway adapts to the patient in front of it. Diabetic, IBD, constipation, prior-failed-prep, elderly, all covered without rewriting the page.
HospitalsAescia for Hospitals is an investigational Software as a Medical Device under the TGA Class IIa pathway. Not yet available for commercial supply.
ClinicsAescia for Clinics is a workflow and patient-preparation tool. It does not propose clinical decisions and is not a medical device.
Aescia for Clinics is a workflow platform for specialty clinics, with endoscopy as the first home. Pre-procedure pathways delivered by SMS and email into a patient web-app. Diabetic, anticoagulant, and GLP-1 overlays. Recall tracking that stops slipping. It does not propose clinical decisions. It is not a medical device.
Posture
Not a medical device. Not a decision tool.
A workflow and patient-preparation platform. Does not diagnose, does not treat, does not propose clinical decisions.
Pick the prep your clinic uses. The pathway adapts to the patient in front of it. Diabetic, IBD, constipation, prior-failed-prep, elderly, all covered without rewriting the page.
Timed reminders in the patient language, a confirm-and-reschedule path built in, a same-day flag your front desk can actually act on. Waitlist auto-fill on cancellation.
Patient self-reports the medication and the dose. The pathway delivers the clinician-authored instruction that corresponds to the patient's report, aligned with the 2024 multi-society guidance and the 2025 international consensus. Decisions remain with the proceduralist.
SGLT2, metformin, DOAC, and warfarin scenarios delivered as clinician-authored instructions, generated from the patient's answers. The clinician signs off the rule set, not the vendor.
The evening before, the patient can upload a toilet-bowl photo through the web-app. The pathway auto-rates it against a clinician-set rubric and either confirms the slot or triggers rescheduling before the patient leaves home.
Two-way messaging by SMS and email answers the top twenty prep questions before they reach the front desk, using templated clinician-authored responses. The clinic sees the exceptions, not every message.
High-risk polyp follow-up and surveillance intervals do not rely on a spreadsheet anyone might miss. Named patients, named dates, named triggers, aligned with USMSTF and NHMRC interval guidance.
Designed to sit alongside the systems your clinic already runs and to be quick to set up, without a second login for your team. We scope any data exchange with you.
Configured by one clinic admin in an afternoon. Per-scope pricing in the US, no per-seat math. Designed to go live in weeks once a champion is in place, not quarters.
This is not a hospital discharge tool dressed for a clinic. It is a prep and workflow product with its own authored protocols, its own SMS layer, and its own vocabulary: today's list, room utilisation, case turnover, prep adequacy, recall compliance.
The pathway covers regional brand equivalents across the markets we support. Clinicians in each country see the prep names their patients see on the shelf.
Endoscopy is the first clinical focus: colonoscopy and gastroscopy pathway development is active, with regional bowel-prep variants and specialty overlays in build. The same engine extends to physiotherapy post-discharge, aesthetics, and other efficiency-seeking specialties as clinical champions join. If your specialty is not listed, we will build the pathway with you.
We do not prescribe which specialties belong on the platform. We ask whether the friction is real, whether there is a clinician willing to co-author the pathway, and whether the patient journey has the kind of between-visit gap the engine can bridge.
Patient-prep coaching, SMS reminders, and structured pre-procedure communication have a published evidence base. The four figures below the ROI calculator are the load-bearing ones for ambulatory endoscopy: Mehta 2021 on a prep-focused intervention, Allen 2023 on the facility-fee cost per cancelled slot, Beran 2024 on the risk factors that make inadequate prep common and addressable (n=358,257, 154 studies), and Lebwohl 2011 on the downstream adenoma miss rate. The calculator acts on late cancellations and no-shows, and credits backfill only on the late cancellations that arrive with about a day's notice, which is enough to fill the slot.
Aescia for Clinics has not yet published its own outcomes. The Hospitals product is in active clinical evaluation through SAFE-Discharge at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, but that trial is cardiothoracic surgical recovery, not endoscopy preparation. The honest position: the calculator below scales the category literature to your site; Aescia-specific outcomes come from the design-partner pilots, measured against your own baseline.
Pathways start from published evidence-based guidelines for each specialty (USMSTF and NHMRC for surveillance, multi-society guidance for GLP-1 peri-procedural handling, regional bowel-preparation protocols, society anticoagulation guidance). A practising clinician authors the rule set against those guidelines. The rules are then stress-tested against simulated synthetic-patient cohorts before they touch a real patient, so edge cases (diabetic and anticoagulated overlays, prior inadequate preparation, GLP-1 exposure with insulin) surface and are resolved in the rule editor rather than in the front-desk call queue. Every pathway carries a named clinical author and a documented guideline trail.
A busy endoscopy list loses more to cancelled prep, GLP-1 confusion, and follow-up drift in a week than Aescia costs for the month. The numbers below are yours, not ours. Set the four inputs to your ASC and the model rescales. Three honest bands, conservative through potential, anchored to the literature beneath.
Set the inputs to your own ASC. Defaults are an average US GI ASC and the US literature midpoints, sourced below. Every figure to the right rescales in real time.
Three bands tied to effect sizes from the literature. Aescia commits to no point estimate. Pilots are scoped to confirm where on the range your site lands.
Four published figures the model relies on. They are listed here in plain text so a procurement reviewer, a clinical advisor, or a retrieval-augmented assistant can verify each one without operating the calculator.
Mehta 2021
Allen 2023, CMS ASC fees CPT 45378–45385
Beran 2024, n=358,257 (154 studies)
Lebwohl 2011
Public and modelled figures. Site-specific ROI requires a scoped evaluation against your own list volume, no-show rate, and prep-inadequacy baseline.
Aescia for Clinics is priced per scope at the single-site level. No per-seat pricing. The range below covers the typical US ambulatory surgery centre by physician count. A site-specific quote is generated against your scope volume in the ROI calculator above.
Single-site single-specialty US ASC typically falls in US$8,000 to US$77,000 per year, by physician count: solo own-facility ~$8K, 4-MD ASC ~$38K, 8-MD ASC ~$64K.
This is the typical span, not a quote. Your exact figure is generated above against your scope volume in the ROI calculator (at US$8 per scope).
For US design partners the rate is locked for three years with a CPI or 5% capped escalator and no conversion to gain-share during the locked term. See the design-partner program for the full commercial shape.
Design-partner terms